Dixon v. Goethals

Supreme Court of the United States
Dixon v. Goethals, 242 U.S. 616 (1916)
37 S. Ct. 211; 61 L. Ed. 529; 1916 U.S. LEXIS 1412

Dixon v. Goethals

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Judgment affirmed with costs upon the authority of McCollum v. Eager, 2 How. 61; Thomas v. Wooldridge, 23 Wall. 283; Buffington v. Harvey, 95 U. S. 99; Rexford v. Brunswick-Balke-Collander Co., 228 U. S. 339, 346. Mr. Benjamin T. Waldo and Mr. Challen B. Ellis for the appellants. The Attorney General and The Solicitor General for the appellees.

Reference

Full Case Name
Gideon Dixon v. George W. Goethals
Status
Published