Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Supreme Court of the United States, 1916

Dixon v. Goethals

Dixon v. Goethals
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided December 4, 1916
242 U.S. 616; 37 S. Ct. 211; 61 L. Ed. 529; 1916 U.S. LEXIS 1412 (United States Reports)

Dixon v. Goethals

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Judgment affirmed with costs upon the authority of McCollum v. Eager, 2 How. 61; Thomas v. Wooldridge, 23 Wall. 283; Buffington v. Harvey, 95 U. S. 99; Rexford v. Brunswick-Balke-Collander Co., 228 U. S. 339, 346. Mr. Benjamin T. Waldo and Mr. Challen B. Ellis for the appellants. The Attorney General and The Solicitor General for the appellees.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑