Minneapolis, St. Paul, & Sault Ste. Marie Railroad Company, in Error v. Louise Alexander, Administratrix, Etc
Minneapolis, St. Paul, & Sault Ste. Marie Railroad Company, in Error v. Louise Alexander, Administratrix, Etc
Opinion
239 U.S. 635
36 S.Ct. 283
MINNEAPOLIS, ST. PAUL, & SAULT STE. MARIE RAILROAD COMPANY, Plaintiff in Error,
v.
LOUISE ALEXANDER, Administratrix, etc.
No. 148.
Supreme Court of the United States
January 10, 1916
Mr. William A. Hayes for plaintiff in error.
Mr. D. W. McNamara and Miss Anna B. Hull for defendant in error.
Per Curiam:
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Consolidated Turnp. Co. v. Norfolk & O. V. R. Co. 228 U. S. 596, 600, 57 L. ed. 982, 983, 33 Sup. Ct. Rep. 609; Manhattan L. Ins. Co. v. Cohen, 234 U. S. 123, 137, 58 L. ed. 1245, 1254, 34 Sup. Ct. Rep. 874; Easterling Lumber Co. v. Pierce, 235 U. S. 380, 59 L. ed. 279, 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 133; (2) Missouri P. R. Co. v. Humes, 115 U. S. 512, 29 L. ed. 463, 6 Sup. Ct. Rep. 110; Minneapolis & St. L. R. Co. v. Beckwith, 129 U. S. 26, 32 L. ed. 585, 9 Sup. Ct. Rep. 207; Minneapolis & St. L. R. Co. v. Emmons, 149 U. S. 364, 37 L. ed. 769, 13 Sup. Ct. Rep. 870; (3) Waters-Pierce Pierce Oil Co. v. Texas, 212 U. S. 112, 118, 53 L. ed. 431, 434, 29 Sup. Ct. Rep. 227; Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co. 226 U. S. 102, 57 L. ed. 140, 33 Sup. Ct. Rep. 80; Overton v. Oklahoma, 235 U. S. 31, 59 L. ed. 112, 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 14.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.