Supreme Court of the United States, 1916

J. J. Broussard, in Error v. R. R. Baker, 1 Chief of Police of the City of Beaumont, Tex

J. J. Broussard, in Error v. R. R. Baker, 1 Chief of Police of the City of Beaumont, Tex
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided January 24, 1916 · Per Curiam
241 U.S. 639; 36 S. Ct. 285 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. Frederick S. Tyler for the plaintiff in error. No appearance for defendant in error.

J. J. Broussard, in Error v. R. R. Baker, 1 Chief of Police of the City of Beaumont, Tex

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Consolidated Turnpike v. Norfolk &c. Ry., 228 U. S. 596, 600; Manhattan Life Ins. Co. v. Cohen, 234 U. S. 123, 137; Easterling Lumber Co. v. Pierce, 235 U. S. 380, 382; (2) Fischer v. St. Louis, 194 U. S. 361; Davis v. Massa *640 chusetts, 167 U. S. 43; (3) Iowa Central Ry. v. Iowa, 160 U. S. 389; Washington v. Miller, 235 U. S. 422, 429; Roby v. South Park Commissioners, 238 U. S. 610.

Mr. Frederick S. Tyler for the plaintiff in error. No appearance for defendant in error.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.