Old Dominion Iron & Nail Works Co. v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
Old Dominion Iron & Nail Works Co. v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co., 242 U.S. 623 (1917)
37 S. Ct. 244; 61 L. Ed. 533; 1917 U.S. LEXIS 1572
Old Dominion Iron & Nail Works Co. v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.
Opinion of the Court
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361; Leathe v. Thomas, 207 U. S. 93; Mellon Company v. McCafferty, 239 U. S. 134; (2) Pierce v. Southern Railway, 171 U. S. 641; Preston v. Chicago, 226 U. S. 447, 450; Wood v. Chesbrough, 228 U. S. 672, 677; (3) Moran v. Horsky, 178 U. S. 205. Mr. Eppa Hunton, Jr., Mr. E. Randolph Williams and Mr. Henry W. Anderson for the plaintiff in error. Mr. H. R. Pollard and Mr. Henry Taylor, Jr., for the defendants in error.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Old Dominion Iron & Nail Works Company, in Error v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company and City of Richmond
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published