Supreme Court of the United States, 1917

St. Louis, San Francisco & Texas Railway Co. v. Smith

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided April 16, 1917

243 U.S. 630; 37 S. Ct. 477; 61 L. Ed. 938; 1917 U.S. LEXIS 1591 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. Frank Andrews and Mr. W. F. Evans for plaintiff in error., Mr. Judson H. Wood and Mr. James P. Haven for defendant in error.

Cases that cite this one

11 later published cases cite this decision.

Ross v. Robinson (Or. 1944)
International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union v. Donnelly Garment Co. (8th Cir. 1941)
Kennard v. Ill. Cent. R. Co. (Tenn. 1941)
McAllister v. Sloan (8th Cir. 1936)
Keith v. Texas P. Ry. Co. (La. 1930)
Keith v. Texas & P. Ry. Co. (La. 1930)
N. & G. Taylor Co. v. Anderson (7th Cir. 1926)
King v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis Rd. Co. (Ohio Ct. App. 1966)
Stolz v. New York Central Railroad (N.Y. 1959)
New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. Kinney (Supreme Court of the United States 1922)
Pope v. Kansas City, Mexico & Orient Railway Co. (Tex. 1918)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Judgment affirmed with costs upon the authority of Missouri, Kansas & Texas Ry. Co. v. Wulf, 226 U. S. 570; Seaboard Air Line Ry. v. Koennecke, 239 U. S. 352, 354; Seaboard Air Line Ry. v. Renn, 241 U. S. 290, 293.

See St. Louis, San Francisco & Texas Ry. Co. v. Seale, 229 U. S. 156.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.