Supreme Court of the United States, 1917

Moore v. Olsness

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided November 5, 1917

245 U.S. 627; 38 S. Ct. 60 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. Aubrey Lawreftce for plaintiff in error., Mr. William Langer for defendants in error.

Cases that cite this one

9 later published cases cite this decision.

Kessler v. Thompson (N.D. 1956)
City of Bismarck v. St. Mary's Church (N.D. 1970)
In re the Appeal of Federal Deposit Insurance (Kan. 1991)
Paluck v. BD. OF CTY. COMM'RS, STARK COUNTY (N.D. 1981)
Paluck v. Board of County Commissioners (N.D. 1981)
Verry v. Trenbeath (N.D. 1967)
Diamond Match Co. v. State Tax Commission (Md. 1938)
Estero Bay Estates, Inc. v. Giddens (United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida 1926)
Jung See v. Nash (8th Cir. 1925)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Equitable Life Assurance Society v. Brown, 187 U. S. 308, 314; Consolidated Turnpike v. Norfolk, etc., Ry. Co., 228 U. S. 596, 600; Manhattan Life Ins. Co. v. Cohen, 234 U. S. 123, 137; (2) Butler v. *628Pennsylvania, 10 How. 402, 415, 416; Newton v. Commissioners, 100 U. S. 548, 559; Taylor v. Beckham, 178 U. S. 548; Wilson v. North Carolina, 169 U. S. 586; (3) Railroad Company v. County of Otoe, 16 Wall. 667, 676; Kies v. Lowrey, 199 U. S. 233; Stewart v. Kansas City, 239 U. S. 14; Heim v. McCall, 239 U. S. 175.

Mr. Aubrey Lawreftce for plaintiff in error. Mr. William Langer for defendants in error.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.