Roller v. Armentrout

Supreme Court of the United States January 28, 1918

Roller v. Armentrout, 245 U.S. 642 (1918)

38 S. Ct. 221; 62 L. Ed. 527; 1918 U.S. LEXIS 1654

Opinion of the Court

Per Quriam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co., 226 U. S. 102, 105; Consolidated Turnpike v. Norfolk &c. Ry. Co., 228 U. S. 596, 600; Ennis Water Works v. Ennis, 233 U. S. 652, 658; Stewart v. Kansas City, 239 U. S. 14; (2) Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361; Leathe v. Thomas, 207 U. S. 93; Holden Land Co. v. Inter-State Trading Co., 233 U. S. 536, 541; Mellon Co. v. McCafferty, 239 U. S. 134.

Reference

Full Case Name: John E. Roller, in Error v. Lindsay M. Armentrout
Status: Published