Supreme Court of the United States, 1918

Collard v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided March 25, 1918

246 U.S. 653; 38 S. Ct. 336; 62 L. Ed. 922; 1918 U.S. LEXIS 1601 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. Matthew O'Doherty for plaintiff in error., Mr. William W. Crawford, Mr. Edmund F: Trábue and Mr. John C. Doolan for defendant in error.

Cases that cite this one

7 later published cases cite this decision.

Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad (District Court, N.D. Iowa 1959)
Damiano v. Pennsylvania R. Co. (3d Cir. 1947)
Keith v. Texas P. Ry. Co. (La. 1930)
Keith v. Texas & P. Ry. Co. (La. 1930)
Newberry v. Central of Georgia Ry. Co. (5th Cir. 1921)
Louisville & N. R. Co. v. Echols (Ala. 1919)
Joslin Manufacturing Co. v. City of Providence (Supreme Court of the United States 1919)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) § 237, Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of Congress of September 6, 1916, c. 448, § 6, 39 Stat. 726; (2) Schlosser v. Hemphill, 198 U. S. 173; Missouri & Kansas Interurban Ry. Co. v. Olathe, 222 U. S., 185; Louisiana Navigation Co. v. Oyster Commission of Louisiana, 226 U. S. 99.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.