Supreme Court of the United States, 1918

Parmelee v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided April 29, 1918

246 U.S. 658; 38 S. Ct. 425; 62 L. Ed. 926; 1918 U.S. LEXIS 1616 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. Arthur E. -Griffin and Mr. Thomas B. McMariin for plaintiff in error., Mr. Neman H. Field for defendant in error.

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

Sean Perryman v. Bellevue College (Wash. Ct. App. 2016)
Clements v. Nashville C. & St. L. Ry. (Tenn. Ct. App. 1925)
Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Mizelle (Va. 1923)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Judgment affirmed with *659costs upon, the authority of Chicago Junction Ry. Co. v. King, 222 U. S. 222; Seaboard Air Line Ry. v. Padgett, 236 U. S. 668, 673; Seaboard Air Line Ry. v. Koennecke, 239 U. S. 352, 355; Great Northern Ry. Co. v. Knapp, 240 U. S. 464, 466; Baltimore & Ohio R. R. Co. v. Whitacre, 242 U. S. 169.

Mr. Arthur E. -Griffin and Mr. Thomas B. McMariin for plaintiff in error. Mr. Neman H. Field for defendant in error.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.