Richards v. Oakley

Supreme Court of the United States December 23, 1918

Richards v. Oakley, 248 U.S. 541 (1918)

39 S. Ct. 134

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk &c. Ry. Co., 228 U. S. 596, 599; Cuyahoga River Power Co. v. Northern Realty Co., 244 U. S. 300; Bilby v. Stewart, 246 U. S. 255, 257. (2) Goodrich v. Ferris, 244 U. S. 71, 81; Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100; Empire State-Idaho Mining Co. v. Hanley, 205 U. S. 225, 232; Brolan *542v. United States, 236 U. S. 216.

Mr. John G. Park for plaintiffs in error.. Mr. William S. Hogsett and Mr. Mont T. Prewitt for defendant in error.

Reference

Full Case Name: Ernest E. Richards, partners, etc. v. Mina M. Oakley
Status: Published