Supreme Court of the United States, 1918

Sears v. Inhabitants of Nahant

Sears v. Inhabitants of Nahant
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided December 23, 1918
248 U.S. 542; 39 S. Ct. 133 (United States Reports)

Sears v. Inhabitants of Nahant

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Dismissed *543for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) McCain v. Des Moines, 174 U. S. 168, 181; Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Ann Arbor R. R. Co., 178 U. S. 239, 243; Hull v. Burr, 234 U. S. 712, 720; Norton v. Whiteside, 239 U. S. 144, 147. (2) Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100; Empire State-Idaho Mining Co. v. Hanley, 205 U. S. 225, 232; Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U. S. 71, 79; Brolan v. United States, 236 U. S. 216. (3) Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk &c. Ry. Co., 228 U. S. 596, 599; Cuyahoga River Power Co. v. Northern Realty Co., 244 U. S. 300, 304; Bilby v. Stewart, 246 U. S. 255, 257.

Mr. Burton E. Eames for plaintiff in error. Mr. Robert G. Dodge, with whom Mr. Arthur D. Hill and Mr. Richard H. Wiswall were on the brief, for defendant in. error.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.