Ayers v. Kingsbury ex rel. State Land Office

Supreme Court of the United States January 7, 1919

Ayers v. Kingsbury ex rel. State Land Office, 248 U.S. 544 (1919)

39 S. Ct. 135

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Messenger v. Kingsbury, 158 California, 611; People v. California Fish Co., 166 California, 576; People v. Banning Co., 166 California, 635. (2) Equitable Life Assurance *545Society v. Brown, 187 U. S. 308, 314; Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk &c. Ry. Co., 228 U. S. 596, 600; Manhattan Life Ins. Co. v. Cohen, 234 U. S. 123, 137. (3) Campbell v. Wade, 132 U. S. 34; Gonzales v. French, 164 U. S. 338, 345; Banning Co. v. California, 240 U. S. 142, 154.

Mr. Charles C. Boynton and Mr. Robert T. Devlin for plaintiffs in error. Mr. U. S. Webb for defendant in error.

Reference

Full Case Name: Frank H. Ayers v. W. S. Kingsbury, as Surveyor General and Ex Officio Register of the State Land Office of the State of California
Status: Published