Supreme Court of the United States, 1919

Bank of California, National Ass'n v. Roberts

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided January 27, 1919 · Per Curiam

248 U.S. 497; 39 S. Ct. 171; 63 L. Ed. 381; 1919 U.S. LEXIS 2265 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. E. S. Pittsburg, Mr. F. D. Madison, Mr. Alfred Sutro and Mr. Oscar Sutro for plaintiff in error. Mr. A. D. Plaw was also on the brief., Mr. U. S. Webb, Attorney General of- the State of California, and Mr. Raymond Benjamin,. Chief Deputy Attorney General, of the State of California, for defendant in error.

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

State Tax Commission v. Baltimore National Bank (Md. 1935)
Baltimore National Bank v. State Tax Commission (Supreme Court of the United States 1936)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Per Curiam:

This case is controlled by the opinion in Bank of California v. Richardson, ante, p. 476. Indeed, it was submitted without briefs upon the briefs filed in that ease. For the reasons stated' in the previous case, therefore, the judgment here must be reversed and the case remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

Reversed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.