Skip to the main content
Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /United States /Cases /Supreme Court of the United States /

1919

317 Supreme Court of the United States opinions from 1919.

  • New Orleans & Northeastern Railroad v. Scarlet 249 U.S. 528, (1919)
  • Yazoo & Mississippi Valley Railroad v. Mullins 249 U.S. 531, (1919)
  • Louisville & Jeffersonville Bridge Co. v. United States 249 U.S. 534, (1919)
  • Eisner, Internal Revenue Collector v. Macomber 252 U.S. 189, (1919)
  • Board of Public Utility Commissioners v. Compañia General de Tabacos de Filipinas 249 U.S. 425, (1919)
  • Oden v. Coco 249 U.S. 587, (1919)
  • Denver & Rio Grande Railroad v. Baird 249 U.S. 587, (1919)
  • United States v. Gudger 249 U.S. 373, (1919)
  • Matters v. Ryan 249 U.S. 375, (1919)
  • Ex Parte Hudgings 249 U.S. 378, (1919)
  • Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad v. United States 249 U.S. 385, (1919)
  • Standard Oil Co. v. Graves 249 U.S. 389, (1919)
  • McKinley v. United States 249 U.S. 397, (1919)
  • Columbus Railway, Power & Light Co. v. City of Columbus 249 U.S. 399, (1919)
  • Burr v. City of Columbus 249 U.S. 415, (1919)
  • Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. Ochs 249 U.S. 416, (1919)
  • Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. State Public Utilities Commission Ex Rel. Cameron 249 U.S. 422, (1919)
  • PUBLIC UTIL. COMMRS. v. Compania General 249 U.S. 425, (1919)
  • Corn Products Refining Co. v. Eddy 249 U.S. 427, (1919)
  • United States v. Laughlin 249 U.S. 440, (1919)
  • Citizens Bank of Michigan City v. Opperman 249 U.S. 448, (1919)
  • United States v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. 249 U.S. 451, (1919)
  • Barbour v. Georgia 249 U.S. 454, (1919)
  • J. E. Hathaway & Co. v. United States 249 U.S. 460, (1919)
  • Ex Parte Wagner 249 U.S. 465, (1919)
  • Southern Pacific R. Co. v. Arizona 249 U.S. 472, (1919)
  • Houston v. St. Louis Independent Packing Co. 249 U.S. 479, (1919)
  • Moore v. United States 249 U.S. 487, (1919)
  • Hartford Life Insurance v. Johnson 249 U.S. 490, (1919)
  • Ex Parte Tracy 249 U.S. 551, (1919)
  • Miller v. McClain 249 U.S. 308, (1919)
  • United States v. Purcell Envelope Co. 249 U.S. 313, (1919)
  • O'Pry v. United States 249 U.S. 323, (1919)
  • Lane v. Darlington 249 U.S. 331, (1919)
  • Capitol Transportation Co. v. Cambria Steel Co. 249 U.S. 334, (1919)
  • Union Oil Co. of Cal. v. Smith 249 U.S. 337, (1919)
  • United States v. Union Pacific Railroad 249 U.S. 354, (1919)
  • Wise v. United States 249 U.S. 361, (1919)
  • United States Ex Rel. Arant v. Lane 249 U.S. 367, (1919)
  • Crescent Milling Co. v. H. N. Strait Manufacturing Co. 249 U.S. 584, (1919)
  • Powers v. Scott County Milling Co. 249 U.S. 585, (1919)
  • Chesapeake & Ohio Coal & Coke Co. v. Toledo & Ohio Central Railway Co. 249 U.S. 585, (1919)
  • Crescent Milling Co. v. H. N. Strait Manufacturing Co. 249 U.S. 586, (1919)
  • Crescent Milling Co. v. H. N. Strait Manufacturing Co. 249 U.S. 586, (1919)
  • Crescent Milling Co. v. H. N. Strait Manufacturing Co. 249 U.S. 586, (1919)
  • Fidelity Title & Trust Co. v. Dubois Electric Co. 249 U.S. 606, (1919)
  • Board of Public Utility Commissioners v. Manila Electric Railroad & Light Co. 249 U.S. 262, (1919)
  • Dominion Hotel, Inc. v. Arizona 249 U.S. 265, (1919)
  • St. Louis Poster Advertising Co. v. City of St. Louis 249 U.S. 269, (1919)
  • Union Tank Line Co. v. Wright 249 U.S. 275, (1919)
« Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑