Supreme Court of the United States, 1920

McLaughlin v. United States

McLaughlin v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided January 12, 1920
251 U.S. 541; 40 S. Ct. 178; 64 L. Ed. 405; 1920 U.S. LEXIS 1713 (United States Reports)

McLaughlin v. United States

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of: (1) Toledo Newspaper Co. v. United States, 247 U. S. 402, 410-411; Bessette v. W. B. Conkey Co., 194 U. S. 324, 328-337; O’Neal v. United States, 190 U. S. 36, 37-38. (2) Carey v. Houston & Texas Central Ry. Co., 150 U. S. 171; Maynard v. Hecht, 151 U. S. 324; Courtney v. Pradt, 196 U. S. 89. (3) In re Lennon, 150 U. S. 393, 399-401. (4) Itow v. United States, 233 U. S. 581; Sugarman v. United States, *542249 U. S. 182, 184. Mr. Daniel L. Cruice and Mr. Rob V. Phillips for plaintiff in error. The Solicitor General and Mr. A. F. Myers for the United States. Mr. Thos. H. Tracy and Mr. George D. Welles, by leave of court, filed a brief as amid curios.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.