Supreme Court of the United States, 1920

Tananevicz v. Illinois

Tananevicz v. Illinois
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided March 15, 1920
252 U.S. 568; 40 S. Ct. 346 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. Emory J. Smith tor plaintiff in error., Mr. Edward J. Brundage and Mr. Edward C. Fitch for defendant in error.

Tananevicz v. Illinois

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of: (1) Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk, etc., Ry. Co., 228 U. S. 326, 334; St. Louis & San Francisco R. R. Co. v. Shepherd, *569240 U. S. 240, 241; Bilby v. Stewart, 246 U. S. 255, 257. (2) Brolan v. United States, 236 U. S. 216, 218; United Surety Co. v. American Fruit Co., 238 U. S. 140, 142; Sugarman v. United States, 249 U. S. 182, 184. (3) Section 237 of the Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of September 6, 1916, c. 448, § 2, 39 Stat. 726.

Mr. Emory J. Smith tor plaintiff in error. Mr. Edward J. Brundage and Mr. Edward C. Fitch for defendant in error.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.