Purcell v. City of Lexington ex rel. Coyne

Supreme Court of the United States June 1, 1920

Purcell v. City of Lexington ex rel. Coyne, 253 U.S. 476 (1920)

40 S. Ct. 583

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon thé authority of: (1) New Orleans Waterworks v. Louisiana Sugar Co., 125 U. S. 18, 38, 39; Central Land Co. v, Laidley, 159 U. S. 103, 111; Bacon v. Texas, 163 U. S. 207, 216; McCullough v. Virginia, 172 U. S. 102, 116; Hubert v. New Orleans, 215 U. S. 170, 175; Missouri & Kansas Interurban By. Co. v. Olathe, 222 U. S. 187,190. (2) Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100; Empire State-Idaho Mining Co. v. Hanley, 205 U. S. 225, 232; Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U. S. 71, ,79; Brolan v. United States, 236 *477U. S. 216, 218; Sugarman v. United States, 249 U. S. 182, 184.

Mr. George C. Webb and Mr. George R. Hunt for plaintiffs in error. Mr. Jesse I. Miller and Mr. Harry B. Miller for defendant in error.

Reference

Full Case Name: J. D. Purcell v. City of Lexington on Relation of Thomas E. Coyne, Back Tax Assessor
Status: Published