Auglaize Box Board Co. v. Hinton

Supreme Court of the United States
Auglaize Box Board Co. v. Hinton, 254 U.S. 610 (1920)
41 S. Ct. 60

Auglaize Box Board Co. v. Hinton

Opinion of the Court

Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Ohio. Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted October 25, 1920. Decided November 8, 1920. Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of: (1) California Powder Works v. Davis, 151 U. S. 389, 393; Cuyahoga River Power Co. v. Northern Realty Co., 244 U. *611S. 300,303; Bilby v. Stewart, 246 U. S. 255, 257; Farson, Son & Co. v. Bird, 248 U. S. 268, 271. (2) Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100; Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U. S. 71, 79; Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Ry. Co. v. Maucher, 248 U. S. 359, 362; Berkman v. United States, 250 U. S. 114, 118. Mr. Earl H. Turner for plaintiff in error. Mr. J. H. Goeke, Mr. T. T. Ansberry and Mr. George T. Farrell for defendants in error.

Reference

Full Case Name
Auglaize Box Board Company v. Bessie Hinton, etc.
Status
Published