Harjo v. Kunkle

Supreme Court of the United States
Harjo v. Kunkle, 254 U.S. 620 (1921)
41 S. Ct. 319; 65 L. Ed. 442; 1921 U.S. LEXIS 1271

Harjo v. Kunkle

Opinion of the Court

Appeal from, the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. Argued January 20, 1921. Decided January 24, 1921. Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon authority of Farrell v. O'Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100; Empire State-Idaho Mining Co. v. Hanley, 205 U. S. 225, 232; Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U. S. 71, 79; Toop v. Ulysses Land Co., 237 U. S. 580, 583; United Surety Co. v. American Fruit Co., 238 U. S. 140, 142; Sugarman v. United States, 249 U. S. 182, 184; Berkman v. United States, 250 U. S. 114, 118; Piedmont Power & Light Co. v. Graham, 253 U. S. 193. Mr. Lewis C. Lawson for appellant. Mr. Preston C. West and Mr. A. A. Davidson, for appellees, submitted.

Reference

Full Case Name
Maggie Harjo v. W. A. Kunkle
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published