Supreme Court of the United States, 1921

Hoy v. Lane

Hoy v. Lane
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided March 28, 1921
255 U.S. 566; 41 S. Ct. 447; 65 L. Ed. 789; 1921 U.S. LEXIS 1294 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. Harry A. Hegarty for appellant and plaintiff in error. Mr. Assistant Attorney General Garnett and Mr. H. L. Underwood for appellee and defendant in error.

Hoy v. Lane

Cases that cite this one

5 later published cases cite this decision. The 4 that cite it most often are listed here.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of: (1) United States v. Boutwell, 17 Wall. 604, 607; Pullman Co. v. Knott, 243 U. S. 447, 449; Shaffer v. Howard, 249 U. S. 200, 201. (2) Act of February 8, 1899, c. 121, 30 Stat. 822; LeCrone v. McAdoo, 253 U. S. 217, 219.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.