Darlington v. Mager

Supreme Court of the United States
Darlington v. Mager, 256 U.S. 682 (1921)
41 S. Ct. 533; 65 L. Ed. 1169; 1921 U.S. LEXIS 1299; 4 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 4745

Darlington v. Mager

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Affirmed with costs, upon authority of the Act of February 24, 1919, c. 18, § 213a, 40 Stat., 1057,; 1065; Act of September 8, 1916, c. 463, § 2 (a), 39 Stat. 756, 757; Merchants' Loan & Trust Co. v. Smietanka, 255 U. S. 509; Eldorado Coal & Mining Co. v. Mager, 255 U. S. 522; Goodrich v. Edwards, 255 U. S. 527; and Walsh v. Brewster 255 U. S. 536. Mr. Herbert Pope, with whom Mr. RusnC. Butler, Mr. James J. For stall and Mr. E. B. Prettyman were on the brief, for plaintiff in error. The Solicitor General for defendant in error.

Reference

Full Case Name
Herbert Darlington v. Harry W. Mager, Collector of Internal Revenue for the First District of Illinois
Status
Published