Supreme Court of the United States, 1921

Darlington v. Mager

Darlington v. Mager
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided April 18, 1921
256 U.S. 682; 41 S. Ct. 533; 65 L. Ed. 1169; 1921 U.S. LEXIS 1299; 4 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 4745 (United States Reports)

Darlington v. Mager

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Affirmed with costs, upon authority of the Act of February 24, 1919, c. 18, § 213a, 40 Stat., 1057,; 1065; Act of September 8, 1916, c. 463, § 2 (a), 39 Stat. 756, 757; Merchants' Loan & Trust Co. v. Smietanka, 255 U. S. 509; Eldorado Coal & Mining Co. v. Mager, 255 U. S. 522; Goodrich v. Edwards, 255 U. S. 527; and Walsh v. Brewster 255 U. S. 536. Mr. Herbert Pope, with whom Mr. RusnC. Butler, Mr. James J. For stall and Mr. E. B. Prettyman were on the brief, for plaintiff in error. The Solicitor General for defendant in error.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.