Supreme Court of the United States, 1922

Borough of Edgewood v. Wilkinsburg & East Pittsburgh Street Railway Co.

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided March 13, 1922

258 U.S. 604; 66 L. Ed. 786; 42 S. Ct. 313; 1922 U.S. LEXIS 2306 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. M. W. Acheson, Jr., with whom Mr. Charles A. Jones, Mr. John D. Meyer, Mr. Roy' G. Bostwick and Mr. James R. Sterrett, were on the brief, for plaintiff in error. Mr. Edwin W. Smith, with whom Mr. John F. Weiss and Mr. Frank M. Hunter were on the briefs, for defendants in error. Mr. H. B. Gill, by leave of court, filed a brief as amicus curiae.

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

City of Trenton v. New Jersey (Supreme Court of the United States 1923)
State of Oklahoma v. State of Texas (United States, Intervener) (Supreme Court of the United States 1924)
City of Winfield v. Court of Industrial Relations (Supreme Court of the United States 1923)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Hunter v. Pittsburgh, 207 U. S. 161, 178; Pawhuska v. Pawhuska Oil Co., 250 U. S. 394, 397; Kansas City v. Public Service Commission of Missouri, 250 U. S. 652; Hillsboro v. Public Service Commission of Oregon; point (3), 255 U. S. 562; Groesbeck v. Detroit United Railway, 257 U. S. 609; Chicago v. Chicago Railways Co., 257 U. S. 617; Avon v. Detroit United Railway, 257 U. S. 618.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.