Supreme Court of the United States, 1922

Williams v. Scudder

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided March 27, 1922 · No. 352

258 U.S. 607; 42 S. Ct. 316; 66 L. Ed. 787; 1922 U.S. LEXIS 2314 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. Smith W. Bennett for plaintiffs in error. Mr. John G. Price and Mr. Roy Martin for defendants in error.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Meeker v. Scudder (Ohio Ct. App. 1922)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of: (1) Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100; Toop v. Ulysses Land Co., 237 U. S. 580, 583; Piedmont Power & Light Co. v. Graham, 253 U. S. 193, 195. (2) Gaar, Scott & Co. v. Shannon, 223 U. S. 468 470; Cuyahoga River Power Co. v. *608Northern Realty Co., 244 U. S. 300, 303; Bilby v. Stewart, 246 U. S. 255, 257; Farson, Son & Co. v. Bird, 248 U. S. 268, 271.

Mr. Smith W. Bennett for plaintiffs in error. Mr. John G. Price and Mr. Roy Martin for defendants in error.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.