Supreme Court of the United States, 1922

McIntosh v. Dill

McIntosh v. Dill
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided October 9, 1922
260 U.S. 694; 43 S. Ct. 12; 67 L. Ed. 467; 1922 U.S. LEXIS 2387 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. Thomas H. Owen and Mr. George C. Crump for plaintiff in error. Mr. Nathan A:, Gibson and Mr. Joseph L. Hull for defendants in error.

McIntosh v. Dill

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of § 237 of the Judicial Code, as 'amended by the Act of September 6, 19.16, c. 448, § 2, 39 Stat. 726; Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. Carrollton, 252 U. S. 1, 5-6.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.