Supreme Court of the United States, 1922

Donley v. Van Horn

Donley v. Van Horn
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided October 16, 1922
260 U.S. 697; 43 S. Ct. 87; 67 L. Ed. 469; 1922 U.S. LEXIS 2395 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. A. Haines for plaintiff in error. Mr. Charles R. Pierce and Air. John M. Sutton for defendantsdn error;

Donley v. Van Horn

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Schlosser v. Hemphill, 198 U. S. 173, 175; Louisiana Navigation Co. v. Oyster Commission of Louisiana, 226 U. S. 99, 101; Coe v. Armour Fertilizer Works, 237 U. S. 413, 418; Bruce v. Tobin, 245 U. S. 18, 19.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.