Supreme Court of the United States, 1923

Redwine v. Texas

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided March 19, 1923

261 U.S. 608; 43 S. Ct. 433; 67 L. Ed. 825; 1923 U.S. LEXIS 2605 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. Joe Burkett and Mr. A. H. Corrigan for plaintiff in error., Mr: W. A. Keeling and Mr. L. C. Sutton for defendant in error.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Ex Parte Seymour (Tex. Crim. App. 1950)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Affirmed with costs upon the authority of *609Ughbanks v. Armstrong, 208 U. S. 481.

Mr. Joe Burkett and Mr. A. H. Corrigan for plaintiff in error. Mr: W. A. Keeling and Mr. L. C. Sutton for defendant in error.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.