Supreme Court of the United States, 1923

Huey v. Brock

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided March 19, 1923 · No. 327

261 U.S. 609; 43 S. Ct. 433; 67 L. Ed. 825; 1923 U.S. LEXIS 2606 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. George H. Lamar, with whom Mr. Theodore J. Lamar was on the brief, for plaintiffs in error., No appearance for defendants in error.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of § 237 of the Judicial Code, as amended by .the Act of September 6, 1916, c. 448, § 2, 39 Stat. 726; Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. Carrollton, 252 U. S. 1, 5-6.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.