Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Supreme Court of the United States, 1923

Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co. v. Bartlesville Zinc Co.

Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co. v. Bartlesville Zinc Co.
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided October 8, 1923
263 U.S. 673; 44 S. Ct. 6; 68 L. Ed. 500; 1923 U.S. LEXIS 2834 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. Joseph B. Cotton, for appellees, in support of the motion. Mr. Watson B. Robins oy, Mr. William J. Hughés and Mr. Charles A. Frueauff, for appellant, in opposition to the motion.

Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co. v. Bartlesville Zinc Co.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Shulthis v. McDougal, 225 U. S. 561, 568, 569; Hull v. Burr, 234 U. S. 712, 720; St. Anthony Church v. Pennsylvania R. R. Co., 237 U. S. 575, 577, 578; Norton v. Whiteside, 239 U. S. 144, 147.

[See infra, 701.]

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.