Supreme Court of the United States, 1923

Harlan v. Harlan

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided December 3, 1923

263 U.S. 681; 44 S. Ct. 135; 68 L. Ed. 504; 1923 U.S. LEXIS 2851 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. Henry E. Davis for appellant. Mr. Henry S. Bobbins for appellee.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Meek v. Centre County Banking Co. (Supreme Court of the United States 1924)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

This case has become moot, because of the institution of the second suit in the Supreme *682Court of the District of Columbia, and the passing of the property involved to the receiver in that suit, with the consent of the plaintiff in this. The cause is therefore remanded to the Court of Appeals with directions to modify its previous decree and enter an order remanding the cause to the Supreme Court of the District directing it to dismiss the case as moot, awarding no costs to either party. United States v. Hamburg-American Co., 239 U. S. 466, 475; Board of Public Utility Commissioners v. Compañia General, 249 U. S. 425, 426-7; Heitmuller v. Stokes, 256 U. S. 359, 362; Atherton Mills v. Johnston, 259 U. S. 13, 15-16.

Mr. Henry E. Davis for appellant. Mr. Henry S. Bobbins for appellee.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.