Supreme Court of the United States, 1924

Molinari v. Maryland

Molinari v. Maryland
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided January 7, 1924
263 U.S. 685; 44 S. Ct. 179; 68 L. Ed. 506; 1924 U.S. LEXIS 2837 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. Clarence Lippel, with whom Mr. Arch A. Young and Mr. Carl G. Mullin were on the brief, for plaintiff in error in No. 127. Mr. Saul Praeger, with whom Mr. Joseph N. Ülman and Mr. G. Tyler Smith were, on the brief, for plaintiff in error in No. 480. Mr. Alexander Armstrong and ■ Mr. Lindsay C. Spencer appeared for defendant in error.

Molinari v. Maryland

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam. Mr. Clarence Lippel, with whom Mr. Arch A. Young and Mr. Carl G. Mullin were on the brief, for plaintiff in error in No. 127. Mr. Saul Praeger, with whom Mr. Joseph N. Ülman and Mr. G. Tyler Smith were, on the brief, for plaintiff in error in No. 480. Mr. Alexander Armstrong and ■ Mr. Lindsay C. Spencer appeared for defendant in error.

Affirmed with costs upon, the authority of: (1) Vigliotti v. Pennsylvania, 258 U. S. 403; (2) Forsyth v. Hammond, 166 U. S. 506, 518; Commissioners v. Bancroft, 203 U. S. 112, 118-119; St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. v. Arkansas, 235 U. S. 350, 362.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.