Supreme Court of the United States, 1924

Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. Shaffer

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided January 14, 1924

263 U.S. 687; 44 S. Ct. 228; 68 L. Ed. 507; 1924 U.S. LEXIS 2841 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. Platt Hub-bell, for defendant in error, in support of the motion. Mr. John E. Dolman, Mr. M. L. Bell, Mr. W. F. Dickinson, Mr. Bruce Scott, Mr. H. J. Nelson and Mr. J. G. Trimble, for plaintiffs in error, in opposition to the. motion.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

City of New York v. Davis (2d Cir. 1925)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Affirmed upon the authority of Minneapolis & St. Louis Ry. Co. v. Beckwith, 129 U. S. 26; Missouri, Kansas & Texas Ry. Co. v. May, 194 U. S. 267; Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co. v. Melton, 218 U. S. 36, 52-53; Jeffrey Mfg. Co. v. Blagg, 235 U. S. 571, 576-577; Rast v. Van Deman & Lewis Co., 240 U. S. 342, 357-358; New York Central *688R. R. Co. v. White, 243 U. S. 188, 208.

Mr. Platt Hub-bell, for defendant in error, in support of the motion. Mr. John E. Dolman, Mr. M. L. Bell, Mr. W. F. Dickinson, Mr. Bruce Scott, Mr. H. J. Nelson and Mr. J. G. Trimble, for plaintiffs in error, in opposition to the. motion.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.