Supreme Court of the United States, 1924

United States ex rel. Durnford v. Work

United States ex rel. Durnford v. Work
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided January 21, 1924
263 U.S. 690; 44 S. Ct. 229; 68 L. Ed. 508; 1924 U.S. LEXIS 2850 (United States Reports)

United States ex rel. Durnford v. Work

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Judgment affirmed upon the authority of *691Riverside Oil Co. v. Hitchcock, 190 U. S. 316; Ness v. Fisher, 223 U. S. 683; Alaska Smokeless Coal Co. v. Lane, 250 U. S. 549; Hall v. Payne, 254 U. S. 343; Brown v. Hitchcock, 173 U. S. 473, 479.

Mr. Samuel Herrick, with whom Mr. P. W. Spaulding was on the brief, for plaintiff in error. Mr. H. L. Underwood', Special Assistant to the Attorney General, with whom Mr. Solicitor General Beck was on the brief, for defendant in error.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.