Supreme Court of the United States, 1924

Stimson v. City of Los Angeles

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided March 3, 1924

264 U.S. 569; 44 S. Ct. 333; 68 L. Ed. 854; 1924 U.S. LEXIS 2548 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. Delphin M. Delmas for appellants. Mr. Jess E. Stephens and Mr. Lucius P. Green for appellees.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

State v. Fahey (New York Court of General Session of the Peace 1924)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Reversed with costs; and cause remanded with directions to dismiss for lack of a substantial federal question. Pacific Electric Ry. Co. v. Los Angeles, 194 U. S. 112, 118; South Covington Ry. Co. v. Newport, 259 U. S. 97, 99; Blumenstock Bros. v. Curtis Publishing Co., 252 U. S. 436, 441.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.