Supreme Court of the United States, 1924

Gulf Refining Co. of Louisiana v. McFarland

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided March 17, 1924

264 U.S. 573; 44 S. Ct. 402; 68 L. Ed. 856; 1924 U.S. LEXIS 2559 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. A. V. Coco, Mr. Harry P. Sneed and Mr. S. L. Herold, for defendant in error, in support of the motion. Mr. D. Edward Greer, for plaintiff in error, in opposition to the motion.

Cases that cite this one

5 later published cases cite this decision.

Bel Oil Corporation v. Fontenot (La. 1959)
Ohio Oil Co. v. Conway (Supreme Court of the United States 1930)
Cooley v. Buie (Tex. Comm'n App. 1927)
United States v. Rudd (District Court, E.D. New York 1927)
Cooley v. Buie (Tex. App. 1926)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Affirmed upon authority of (1) Choctaw & Gulf R. R. Co. v. Harrison, 235 U. S. 292; Lacoste v. Department of Conservation of Louisiana, 263 U. S. 545; (2) Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co. v. Mottley, 219 U. S. 467, 482; Chicago & Alton R. R. Co. v. Tranbarger, 238 U. S. 67, 76-77; Union Dry Goods Co. v. Georgia Public Service Corporation, 248 U. S. 372, 375; Levy Leasing Co. v. Siegel, 258 U. S. 242, 247.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.