Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Supreme Court of the United States, 1924

Stickel v. Big Laurel Coal Co.

Stickel v. Big Laurel Coal Co.
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided October 13, 1924
266 U.S. 580; 45 S. Ct. 90 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. Harold A. Ritz, for defendant in error, in support of the motion. Mr. Maynard F. Stiles and Mr. Hallack F. Rose, for plaintiff in error, in opposition to the motion.

Stickel v. Big Laurel Coal Co.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction, upon the authority of King v. Mullins, 171 U. S. 404; King v. West Virginia, 216 U. S. 92; Fay v. Crozer, 217 U. S. 455.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.