Supreme Court of the United States, 1924

Hile v. City of Cleveland

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided October 27, 1924

266 U.S. 582; 45 S. Ct. 97 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. Carl F. Shuler, Mr. Alfred Clum and Mr. H. H. McKeehan appeared for defendant in error.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Moore v. Election Commissioners (Mass. 1941)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction, upon authority of McCain v. Des Moines, 174 U. S. 168; Western Union Tel. Co. v. Ann Arbor R. R. Co., 178 U. S. 239; Spencer v. Duplan Silk Co., 191 U. S. 526; Shulthis v. McDougal, 225 U. S. 561; Hull v. Burr, 234 U. S. 712; Norton v. Whiteside, 239 U. S. 144. Mr. *583George D. Hile pro se.

Mr. Carl F. Shuler, Mr. Alfred Clum and Mr. H. H. McKeehan appeared for defendant in error.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.