Supreme Court of the United States, 1925

Holmes v. Bronaugh

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided January 5, 1925

266 U.S. 592; 45 S. Ct. 196 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. C. C. Hatchett, for defendant in error, in support of the motion to dismiss. Mr. Reford Bond, for plaintiff in error, in opposition to the motion.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of § 237 of the Judicial Code as amended by the Act of September 6, 1916, c. 448, § 2, 39 Stat. 726; Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co. v. Gilbert, 245 U. S. 162; Ireland v. Woods, 246 U. S. 323, 328; Stadelman v. Miner, 246 U. S. 544, 546; Chicago Great Western R. R. Co. v. Basham, 249 U. S. 164, 165; Citizens Bank v. Opperman, 249 U. S. 448, 450; Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. Carrollton, 252 U. S. 1, 5, 6.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.