County of Tuolumne v. Railroad Commission of California

Supreme Court of the United States March 16, 1925

County of Tuolumne v. Railroad Commission of California, 267 U.S. 584 (1925)

45 S. Ct. 461

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) section 237 of the Judicial Code, as amended by the *585act of September 6, 1916, c. 448, sec. 2, 39 Stat: 726; Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. Carrollton, 252 U. S. 1, 5-6; (2) Schuyler National Bank v. Bollong, 150 U. S. 85, 88; Erie R. R. Co. v. Purdy, 185 U. S. 148, 154; Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co. v. Woodford, 234 U. S. 46, 51.

Mr. William Grant, for plaintiffs in error. Mr. A. P. Cutten and Mr. Carl I. Wheat, with whom Mr. Hugh Gordon and Mr. Wm. B. Bosley were on the brief, for defendants in error.

Reference

Full Case Name: County of Tuolumne v. Railroad Commission of the State of California
Status: Published