Supreme Court of the United States, 1925

County of Tuolumne v. Railroad Commission of California

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided March 16, 1925

267 U.S. 584; 45 S. Ct. 461 (United States Reports)

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) section 237 of the Judicial Code, as amended by the *585act of September 6, 1916, c. 448, sec. 2, 39 Stat: 726; Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. Carrollton, 252 U. S. 1, 5-6; (2) Schuyler National Bank v. Bollong, 150 U. S. 85, 88; Erie R. R. Co. v. Purdy, 185 U. S. 148, 154; Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co. v. Woodford, 234 U. S. 46, 51.

Mr. William Grant, for plaintiffs in error. Mr. A. P. Cutten and Mr. Carl I. Wheat, with whom Mr. Hugh Gordon and Mr. Wm. B. Bosley were on the brief, for defendants in error.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.