Murphy v. Sardell

Supreme Court of the United States
Murphy v. Sardell, 269 U.S. 530 (1925)
46 S. Ct. 22

Murphy v. Sardell

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed upon the. authority of Adkins v. Children’s Hospital, 261 U. S. 525. Mr. Justice Holmes requests that it be stated that his concurrence is solely upon the ground that he regards himself bound by the decision in Adkins v. Children’s Hospital.

Mr. Justice Brandeis dissents.

Reference

Full Case Name
John W. Murphy, Attorney General of the State of Arizona v. A. Sardell
Cited By
9 cases
Status
Published