Supreme Court of the United States, 1925

Donohue v. Maine

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided October 19, 1925

269 U.S. 531; 46 S. Ct. 22 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Messrs. Herbert E. Holmes and E. N.- Pike for plaintiffs in error. Messrs. Bansford W. Shaw and Edward W. Wheeler for defendant in error.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdic*532tion upon the. authority of (1) section 237 of the Judicial Code as amended by the act of September 6, 1916, c. 448, sec. 2, 39 Stat. 726 ; (2) United States v. Lanza, 260 U. S. 377, 382; Twining v. New Jersey, 211 U. S. 78, 93; Barron v. Baltimore, 7 Pet. 243.

Messrs. Herbert E. Holmes and E. N.- Pike for plaintiffs in error. Messrs. Bansford W. Shaw and Edward W. Wheeler for defendant in error.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.