Supreme Court of the United States, 1925

Sandel v. South Carolina

Sandel v. South Carolina
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided October 26, 1925
269 U.S. 532; 46 S. Ct. 100 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Messrs. Samuel M. Wolfe and A. M.,Lumpkin for the' defendant in error, in support of the motion., Mr: William N. Graydon for plaintiff in error, in opposition thereto.

Sandel v. South Carolina

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Iowa Central Ry. Co. v. Iowa, 160 U. S. 389, 393; Castillo v. McConnico, 168 U. S. 674, 683; Rawlins v. Georgia, 201 U. S. 638; Burt v. Smith, 203 U. S. 129, 136; Standard Oil Co. v. Missouri, 224 U. S. 270, 281; DeBearn v. Safe Deposit Co., 233 U. S. 24, 34; McDonald v. Oregon R. R. & Navigation Co., 233 U. S. 665, 669-670; Gasquet v. Lapeyre, 242 U. S. 367, 369, 370:

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.