Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Supreme Court of the United States, 1926

City of Fort Smith v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.

City of Fort Smith v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided January 25, 1926
270 U.S. 627; 46 S. Ct. 206 (United States Reports)

Counsel

[Mr. Vincent M. Miles, with whom Mr. Thomas B. Pryor was on the brief, for appellants. . Mr. E. W., Clausen, with whom Messrs. J. W. Jamison and C. M. Bracelen were on the brief, for appellee.

City of Fort Smith v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Affirmed with costs, upon the authority of Newton v. Consolidated Gas Co., 258 U. S. 165, 175; Galveston Electric Co. v. City of Galveston, 258 U. S. 388, 395; State of Missouri ex rel. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Service Commission of Missouri, 262 U. S. 276, 287; Georgia Ry. & Power Co. v. Railroad Commission of Georgia, 262 U. S. 625, 631; Bluefield Water Works & Improvement Co. v. Public Service Commission of West Virginia, 263 U. S. 679, 690.

Clausen, with whom Messrs. J. W. Jamison and C. M. Bracelen were on the brief, for appellee.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.