Supreme Court of the United States, 1926

McMahon v. Montour Railroad

McMahon v. Montour Railroad
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided January 25, 1926
270 U.S. 628; 46 S. Ct. 207 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. J. Thomas Hoffman, with whom. Mr. C. D. Scully was on the brief, for petitioner. Mr. Don Rose for respondent

McMahon v. Montour Railroad

Cases that cite this one

5 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Reversed with costs, upon the authority of Southern Ry. Co. v. United States, 222 U. S. 20; Texas & Pacific Ry. Co. v. Rigsby, 241 U. S. 33, 37.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.