Supreme Court of the United States, 1926

Boyd v. Smythe

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided April 12, 1926

270 U.S. 635; 46 S. Ct. 470; 70 L. Ed. 772; 1926 U.S. LEXIS 463 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. Lloyd L. Duke for plaintiff in error. Messrs. Benjamin J. Gibson and Neill Garrett for defendant in error. .

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Glenn v. Doyal (Supreme Court of the United States 1932)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Application for a writ of super-sedeas and for leave to file a bond denied; motion for leave to amend the petition in error denied, and the writ of error dismissed, for want of jurisdiction, upon thé authority of Iowa C. R. Co. v. Iowa, 160 U. S. 389, 393; Castillo v. McConnico, 168 U. S. 674, 683; Rawlins v. Georgia, 201 U. S. 638; Burt v. Smith, 203 U. S. 129; Standard Oil Co. v. Missouri, 224 U. S. 270, 281; DeBearn v. Safe Deposit & Trust Company, 233 U. S. 24, 34; McDonald v. Oregon R. R. & Nav. Co., 233 U. S. 665, 669, 670; Gasquet v. Lapeyre, 242 U. S. 367, 369, 370; (2) McCain v. Des Moines, 174 U. S. 168, 181; Western Union Tel. Co. v. Ann Arbor R. R. Co., 178 U. S. 239, 243; Spencer v. Duplan Silk Co., 191 U. S. 526, 530; Shulthis v. McDougal, 225 U. S. 561, 569; Hull v. Burr, 234 U. S. 712, 720; Norton v. Whiteside, 239 U. S. 144, *636147.

Mr. Lloyd L. Duke for plaintiff in error. Messrs. Benjamin J. Gibson and Neill Garrett for defendant in error. .

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.