Supreme Court of the United States, 1926

Henry v. Irwin

Henry v. Irwin
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided April 12, 1926
270 U.S. 636; 46 S. Ct. 469 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. Randolph Henry for plaintiff in error. Messrs. Harvey B. Apperson and Charles D. Fox, Jr., for defendants in error.

Henry v. Irwin

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Dismissed upon the authority of McCain v. Des Moines, 174 U. S. 168, 181; Western Union Tel. Co. v. Ann Arbor R. R. Co., 178 U. S. 239, 243; Spencer v. Duplan Silk Co., 191 U. S. 526, 530; Shulthis v. McDougal, 225 U. S. 561, 569; Hull v. Burr, 234 U. S. 712, 720; Norton v. Whiteside, 239 U. S. 144, 147; (2) California Powder Works v. Davis & Co., 151 U. S. 389, 393; Goar, Scott & Co. v. Shannon, 223 U. S. 468, 470; Consol. Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk & Ocean View R. R. Co., 228 U. S. 596, 599; Yazoo & Miss. Valley R. R. Co. v. Brewer, 231 U. S. 245, 249; Cuyahoga River Power Co. v. Northern Realty Co., 244 U. S. 300, 303; Municipal Securities Corp. v. Kansas City, 246 U. S. 63; Bilby v. Stewart, 246 U. S. 255, 257; Farson, Son & Co. v. Bird, 248 U. S. 268, 271.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.