Peacock v. Reinecke

Supreme Court of the United States April 26, 1926

Peacock v. Reinecke, 271 U.S. 643 (1926)

46 S. Ct. 481

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want, of jurisdiction upon the authority of Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100; Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U. S. 71, 79; Toop v. Ulysses Land Company, 237 U. S. 580, 583; United Security Company v. American Fruit Produce Company, 238 U. S. 140, 142; Sugarman v, United States, 249 U. S. 182, 184; Berkman v. United States, 250 U. S. 114, 118; Piedmont Power & Light Com*644pany v. Town of Graham, 263 U. S. 193, 195.

Mr. Herbert Pope, with whom Messrs. James F. Forstall and E. Barrett Prettyman were on the brief, for appellant. Solicitor General Mitchell, with whom Assistant Attorney General Willebrandt and Mr. Sewall Key were on the brief, for appellee.

Reference

Full Case Name: Emelie W. Peacock v. Mabel G. Reinecke, Collector of Internal Revenue for the First Internal Revenue District of Illinois
Status: Published