Supreme Court of the United States, 1926

Rissling v. City of Milwaukee

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided May 3, 1926

271 U.S. 644; 46 S. Ct. 484 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. Leon B. Lam-from for plaintiff in error. Messrs. John M. Niven and Leo. A. Mullaney for defendant in error.

Cases that cite this one

7 later published cases cite this decision.

Western Maryland Railway Co. v. Continental Grain Co. (District Court, S.D. New York 1963)
Cory Corporation and Mitchell Manufacturing Company, Delaware Corporations v. Ernest J. Sauber (7th Cir. 1961)
In re Franklin Saving & Loan Co. (District Court, E.D. Tennessee 1940)
In re Franklin Savings & Loan Co. (District Court, E.D. Tennessee 1940)
Independent Electricians & Electrical Contractors' Ass'n v. New Jersey Board of Examiners of Electrical Contractors (N.J. 1969)
Paper v. Commissioner (United States Board of Tax Appeals 1933)
Jackson v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (3d Cir. 1931)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Affirmed upon the authority of Gundling v. Chicago, 177 U. S. 183; Barbier v. Connolly, 113 U. S. 27; Reinman v. City of Little Rock, 237 U. S. 171.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.